Pages

Monday, March 4, 2013

Film Advertising in Early Cinema: Part 2

This is the part two of an article from the March 1917 issue of Moving Picture World about the early years of movie advertising. This section focuses on the development of more sophisticated advertising techniques such as the campaign, or press book, and the emergence of the serial in American film. Click here for Part 1

What did you think of the article? Has movie advertising really changed in the past 100 years?Let me know in the comments.
____________________________

TEN YEARS OF FlLM ADVERTISING by Epes Winthrop Sargent - PART 2

Perhaps no greater contrast may be found than to compare the work ten years ago with that of today. Then the advertising man — where there was any — was generally the editor as well. He looked after the scripts and advertising, and still had a little spare time. One company, for example, demanded each week copy for a quarter page advertisement in one paper and a half page in another. Twice a month a sixteen page bulletin release was got out and each week three or four squibs were sent out to the trade papers.

One or possibly two cuts had to be made for each one reel subject, and later the editor also sent out the still pictures to the lithographer.  That was all that was done or could be done. Today the large organizations have extensive staffs of writers. Not all of them are good, perhaps, but they help to keep up the high cost of white paper.

In addition to preparing advertising copy the press room supplies weekly several thousand words of press stuff, ranging from three lines to several typewritten pages. Cuts of one and sometimes two screens are prepared, often more than one cut of a subject and in one, two and three column measures. Ready set advertisements are prepared and often may be had in matrix form for inexpensive mailing.
 
Pressbooks first appeared in
1913 for the Italian epic
Quo Vadis?
There are elaborate special stories of each release and the usual synopsis, and there is paper of all sizes as well as a stock of portrait cuts and postcards. It is in the serial, however, that the greatest advancement is shown. For these most companies now prepare elaborate campaign books.

These may list a hundred or more sheets of paper, ranging from the half sheet to twenty eights. There will be a careful teaser and followup campaign planned out, a series of stunt suggestions,  perhaps a number of novelty advertisements, such as buttons, pins, pennants, puzzles and the like, from fifteen to fifty cuts ranging from thumbnail to half page layouts, copy for advertising for each installment and special press stories for the preliminary campaign and each chapter.

Advertising novelties and paper and cuts are supplied about at cost. The rest is all free, and yet three or four  years ago the first suit of press stuff for a feature brought  five dollars for about twenty typewritten pages - and was  worth it. Today the campaign book is free and is frequently backed up by elaborate newspaper campaigns, the most ambitious and unique being the recent Pathe campaign, though the most persistent advertising is that done in the Hearst newspapers for the International pictures.

The Universal has got out a number of remarkable books and Bluebird issues a four page sheet for each release that gives the exhibitor all he needs in the way of publicity material. All he has to have is the sheet, a pair of shears and an advertising account with the local papers. The smallest releasing organization today does more for the exhibitor than did all of the companies combined ten years ago, and does it more intelligently.

On the exhibiting end the change has been even more marked. The exhibitor not only makes use of the material given him, but he improves upon it. Ten years ago he had nothing but stock paper with which to work.  There was no true to film paper. He bought of the show print concerns paper of defunct theatrical productions.

*Poster for a multi-part serial
by film pioneer William Selig, 
this one for 1913's
The Adventures of
Kathlyn,
also recognized as
the first cliffhanger serial

Some of this was positively vicious and contributed in no small degree to the demand for a censorship. Reformers did not go into the theater to see how bad the films were.  A glance at the lobby display was sufficient.
A Selig* release, for example, showed a girl jumping off a bridge. It was a sixty foot bridge, and that in itself was a real thriller for those days. She just jumped off the bridge and towed the hero to land. One house dug up a one sheet for this showing two men in a boat bearing down on a girl and a man struggling in the water. One of the boatmen was shooting at the man in the water and the other was preparing to beat the girl over the head with an oar.

It was a gross libel on a well written picture, but people looked at the paper and not at the film and decided that the pictures must need reforming. Take fifteen or twenty sheets like this, plastered over the front of a converted store, dark, filthy and odorous in the extreme, and the passerby was scarcely to be blamed for being unwilling to risk his health and pocketbook in so unsavory a place. 

END OF PART TWO
O



Monday, February 18, 2013

Film Advertising in Early Cinema: Part 1


This is the first part of an article from the March 1917 issue of Moving Picture World that provides an insightful and sometimes humorous look into the early years of movie advertising. In today's age of multi-million dollar movie ad budgets and sophisticated social media campaigns, it's a fascinating first-hand account of the relatively simple origins of what has become a very complex discipline.

Due to the article's length, I'll be dividing it into three parts for this week. My own comments and context of the article are in bold.

What did you think of the article? Let me know in the comments.
____________________________

TEN YEARS OF FlLM ADVERTISING by Epes Winthrop Sargent

APPROXIMATELY ninety five per cent, of the history of film advertising has been written in the past ten years (1907-1917) and more than fifty per cent, of the whole in the past five. Although it is twenty years since the motion picture was brought forward as a public entertainment, it is only within the past five years that the pictures have been handled as an amusement proposition should be.

The first movie poster ever made is believed to be an 1890 French lithograph printed by renowned illustrator Jules Cheret to promote the short film program"Projections Artistiques." Early film posters were merely stated the film's name and showtimes, with the imagery focusing on the live theatrical acts which made up most of an evening's bills.

First Movie Poster Ever - Louis Lumiere's L'arroseur Arrosé from 1895
Poster for the 1895 film L'arroseur Arrosé
The first known poster to promote a stand-alone movie was for 1895's L'arroseur Arrosé, also considered cinema's first comedy. Shot by early cinema pioneer Louis Lumiere,  it is also the first poster to depict an actual scene from a film.

Looking at the final film below, it's clear that despite its crudeness by today's standards, at least the poster is accurate as to what viewers would actually see, unlike some of today's misleading film posters and ad campaigns.

L'arroseur Arrosé (1895)

Film Advertising falls naturally into two parts, advertising to the exhibitor on the part of the manufacturer of film and the exhibitor's efforts to reach an enlarged public. The manufacturer was the first to perceive the value of printer's ink in its various forms.

Back in 1896 little or no advertising was done on behalf of the film. Later the Clipper, then the chief organ of the exhibitor of amusements, was used as a medium, and this was followed by direct appeal to the exhibitor through circulars or bulletins. It was all limited in scope and, for the greater part, rather amateurish. At the start there was not much to be advertised, to tell the truth. Production was comparatively small and decidedly irregular.

The adoption of the release by dates helped somewhat to regulate advertising on the part of manufacturers, but there seemed to be small need for great endeavors. There was a demand greater than the supply, sales were good and intensive methods were not yet needed. The condition was much the same as that which confronts the pioneer farmer working the virgin soil. The rudest sort of cultivation brought rich returns.

But these returns were too great to escape the observation of the speculator. Companies multiplied and in proportionately larger ratio than the demand increased. More advertising had to be done to sell the same amount of film, but this advertising was largely written by someone untrained to the work and much of it was crude, though better than nothing.  

Even so late as 1909 things were dormant. The manufacturer used the trade mediums, he got out a more or less ornate bulletin, but there he stopped. He did not even realize that there was another and more productive form of advertising which has come to be known as "service."

With the formation of the Motion Picture Patents Company, which controlled nearly the entire output of film, there was adopted a rule that no manufacturer should give to the exchange or exhibitor any advertising matter of any description.

Most of the units of the company went further than this and even where exhibitors were willing to pay for cuts of scenes or for still pictures from which cuts might be made, the request was looked upon as a nuisance and this service denied.  It was not until 1910 or 1911 that the Edison company began to seek to accommodate the live wires with cuts, generally electros of the cuts in their publication.

But one concession was made in that in 1909 arrangements were effected whereby the A. B. C. Company, of Cleveland, got out a one sheet for each release. This paper cost fifteen cents a sheet, but even at that it represented a considerable loss to the companies since a certain edition had to be purchased outright, the stuff being sold to the exchanges or exhibitors on behalf of the manufacturer.

It was not until the advent of the multiple reel that this advertising through service really began. Here was something that could be advertised to advantage. It paid the maker to have his release boomed by the exhibitor, and there began the change that reached its climax in the present national advertising on the part of the manufacturer.

Just how valuable this national advertising is to manufacturer and exhibitor is more or less a matter of personal opinion, though it would seem that the return is more general than specific. It has helped, however, to break down the barrier of the business office and to give the films their proper place in the reading pages.

Ten years ago few papers mentioned the pictures, though  there were a few which made a practice of writing up the pictures and then holding up some company for payment. Seven or eight years ago, for example, a New York paper sent around a page story and asked a certain company a four figure sum for its insertion.

This arguably reflects the perception of the media and upper classes in the early 20th century of films as a lowly undesirable diversion. Many theatre actors who performed in early films did it solely for the money and felt that the work was far beneath their abilities.These methods do not obtain today to any marked degree. Public interest in the pictures is too great to permit them to be ignored, and the house advertising satisfies the hungriest business office, but the manufacturer contributes indirectly to this work a greater sum weekly than he was occasionally asked to pay some paper. Also he gets more for it.

END OF PART ONE

Friday, June 8, 2012

The State of the American Movie Scene in 1916

This article from the February 1916 U.S. film fan magazine Film Players Herald is a veritable treat for the early cinema lover. 

It provides an insightful snapshot of the excitement felt by the American film industry, at a time when the European film industry, which had become a dominant force in world cinema pre-WW1, was near collapse. 

The article also takes a look at the moviegoing habits of the time, the financial workings of the industry (quickly becoming standardized), but more importantly, it emphasizes the vital emotional connection to the cinema and the obsessions with celebrity that had begun to fascinate the world.

It's a long read, but well worth it.
 

What part of the article did you find the most interesting (or not)? Post a comment and let me know.


____________________________

THE BILLION DOLLAR PASTIME
The Riches of Midas and Croesus Mere Pin-Money Compared with the World's Most Lavish Amusement and Most Astounding Industry!

Let us see how big the movie story is, set to figures-thousands, millions, tens of millions. There are, in the United States, about 21,000 photoplay theatres. Some of these have 300 seats, some 600, some 800, some 1,000, and others in excess of 1,000. Most of them exhibit three or four times nightly, and seven days a week. A few years ago, the picture theatres were closed during the summer. Now, nearly all of them operate every day of the year. Some of them, especially in large cities, are in operation afternoon and evening. 

Let us see if we can find an average as to the seating capacity and the number of shows a week. Suppose we put the seating capacity at 500 for each theatre. That would mean a total seating capacity of 10,500,000 for the 21,000 theatres. Suppose we put the average number of afternoon performances at three, making twenty-one a week. Suppose we take only two matinee days, with three extra performances each day, or six additional exhibitions, which would give us twenty-seven each week.

Let us say that the theatres are not filled to capacity twenty-seven times weekly, but fifteen times each week. That would give us 157,500,000 paid admissions every week in the picture theatres of the United States. This means that the lowest estimate that we can place on regular patronage would be 25,000,000 persons, with another 25,000,000 as incidental patrons, going perhaps once or twice a week. Millions of enthusiasts will go to two or three different theatres in an evening, (if the theatres are convenient and there are that many in the town or neighborhood).

The smallest price charged is 5c. In the large cities, most of the better class of playhouses charge 15c and 25c, but the great majority charge a dime. Suppose we were to place the average at 8c. That would mean $12,600,000 paid every week, and for fifty-two weeks the total would be $655,200,000.

This is a modest estimate. Indeed, it is a very low estimate, because the seating capacity will undoubtedly be far greater than we have indicated. Therefore, we may take as the absolute minimum, the sum of $655,200,000 as the amount of money paid by the American public to see the pictures.

Now-just to prove how modest this estimate really is - let us take "The Birth of a Nation" as an example of what a big feature can do financially. This play, on January 5, 1916, completed a solid run of one year in the city of Chicago alone. For 365 days it gave two shows a day. That meant 730 shows in one year. First, it was at the Illinois Theatre, and later it was at the Colonial Theatre-the seating capacity of each being over 1500. Certainly 1500 persons on the average viewed "The Birth of a Nation" during each of these 730 performances. That meant 1,095,000 paid admissions. Half of this seating capacity was sold at $1.00 a seat.

This would amount to $547,500. The balance of the house was sold at 75c and 50c and 25c, or at an average of 50c; making another $273,750, or a total of $821,250. These figures we have not secured from the exhibitors, but they are based on facts that even the most casual observation would have learned. 

Watch D.W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation (1915)

At the same time, this same play was running to capacity in New York, Boston, and other large cities, and at this time is being exhibited in smaller cities. "The Birth of a Nation" will undoubtedly have gathered in $6,000,000 or more, at the time it has run the gamut of its popularity. 

"The Million Dollar Mystery" was exhibited in 2,500 picture theatres at one time; or, in other words, during the days of the early releases. There were 23 weekly episodes, and we understand that the price charged was about 0.25 an episode, or about $575 for the series.

At this rate, the 2,500 theatres alone, would have paid a rental fee for the films of $1,437,500. Hundreds of other theatres ran these pictures long after the first release dates, and then the series went to England and had as heavy a run there. The figures presented have nothing to do with what the public paid at the box offices at these hundreds of theatres. But there is one fact that will convey a very clear idea of what this one serial did financially. The Syndicate Film Corporation, that distributed "The Million Dollar Mystery" -a $100,000 corporation-paid in excess of 700% to its stockholders on the basis of par. 

This was merely one of a great many serial productions. Within a space of two years there were the big serials that started with "Kathlyn," and that included "Lucille Love," "The Perils of Pauline," "The Master Key," "The Broken Coin," The Black Box," "The Diamond from the Sky," "The Adventures of Elaine," and a great many others of that type.

The World's Most Remarkable Business
 

The moving picture business is unquestionably the world's most remarkable and fastest growing branch of commercial endeavor. It has grown so rapidly that there are not even any dependable statistics; because, at the time they are compiled, greater growth has occurred. The great film organizations that are so familiar to us today, date back but a few years. Few of them existed before 1900.

Although the cinematograph was invented in the 'nineties, the moving picture business is a twentieth century institution. It has been estimated variously as the fifth, and fourth, and even the third industry in importance in the United States. A better idea of how it ranks may be gained by reference to statistical facts. 

All classes of manufacturing in the United States produce about $21,000,000,000 yearly. The agricultural production of the United States is about $6,000,000,000 yearly, exclusive of livestock. The operating revenue of the railways of the United States is about $3,000,000,000 annually. There are, in the United States, over 25,000 banks-but the banking business should not necessarily be taken as a separate industry, but rather as an adjunct to all other industries. This, then, would place the motion picture business fourth in line; or, counting banks as a separate industry, fifth in order. 

The motion picture business today amounts to more than the automobile industry. It is about ten times as important as ship-building. It is worth anywhere from five to eight times as much as all of the agricultural implements manufactured. It is about equal with the products of flour and grist mills. It is about four times as important as the carriage and wagon industry. It is practically equal to the entire production of steel works and rolling mills. These comparisons may convey a working idea of the importance of moving pictures. 

At the same time, let us remember that the animated photographs, as a systematized branch of industry, date back but about eight years. In fact, it is doubtful if eight years ago there was such a thing as a picture theatres were remodeled stores. Today, there are hundreds of theatres far more costly than any that were devoted to the speaking drama. 

It is believed that the picture industry employs at least 300,000 persons in its various branches, and that about 35,000 of these persons are actors and actresses, ranging from the leading parts down to the extras

All of the other industries, (With the single exception of automobiles), with which we have made comparisons, date back decades. The motor car and the motion picture have been the two great industrial marvels of recent times. But the picture business has outstripped the motor car industry, that started at about the same time. Whenever you see a modern limousine or touring car or roadster or truck, remember that it was conceived and worked out at practically the same time that the motion pictures were being perfected.

Bear in mind that if we are to take that class of industries dependent on manufacturing, we can place moving pictures as at least fourth, and very likely as third. It is exceeded; if, indeed, it is exceeded at all, by one, two or three industrial branches, and those that outstrip it were in existence for generations before the cinematograph became a reality.

Ideas of Profit
 

To convey a fair working idea of the amount of money invested and the profits realized, we may make reference to a few of the large film manufacturing and distributing organizations.

The net profits of the leading picture companies are estimated at $50,000,000 yearly, not including theatres. Many of the organizations that are today capitalized according to industrial custom, started on veritable shoestrings. Other companies, dating back but a few years, were organized and capitalized in a big way and they paid the customary rate of earnings on the stock. It is stated that both the Kalem and Vitagraph companies started originally with $10,000 capital. When Carl Laemmle came to Chicago from a small Wisconsin town, he invested a few hundred dollars in a picture theatre. Out of that modest' beginning he expanded his business until it became the great Universal Film' Company of today. 

We think it is conservative to estimate that at least a quarter of a billion dollars is invested in picture theatres alone in the United States, and that the investments in studios and exchanges will easily equal that sum. The amount of capital actually invested in the moving picture business is not far from $500,000,000.

While every producing company, and every exchange, and every picture theatre has not necessarily succeeded - a great many of them have won in a tremendous way. We know exhibitors who have realized 100% and better on their investment ever since they started, which was some years ago. There is one picture playhouse on State Street, Chicago, that is said to be clearing over $100,000 annually. 

Like any other business, the moving picture industry has been obliged to go through its experiences and correct its errors, The majority of persons starting picture theatres were without experience in theatrical management. Apart from general fundamental business experience, none of those entering the picture industry had the advantage of any precedent to guide them. And yet they have literally wallowed in millions and billions. The amount of money that has been paid in the United States alone for the purpose of being entertained by the silent drama, has probably been well in excess of $3,000,000,000 within the past six or seven years,

The World's Most Lavish Business
 

Not only is the motion picture industry the most remarkable and the fastest growing of all industries, but it is the most lavish of them all.

The Census Bureau stated that in the year 1914, the amount of film produced in this country, including the original negatives and positives, or prints, amounted to 385,000,000 feet, or 77,000 miles. This would be a stretch of film sufficient to extend around the earth at the equator, three and one-twelth times.

During the early days of picture manufacturing, there was a great deal of substitution and trickery but this was supplanted rapidly by realism of the most costly and thrilling nature. 


To convey a fair idea of what is really spent to entertain the public, let us refer to a coming David Wark Griffith production that will likely be released in the autumn of 1916. This is being produced at the Fine Arts studios near Los Angeles, California. This play, which is to be known as "The Woman and the Law," will have in it a fade-in-and fade-out view of the Gates of Jerusalem. In order to make this vision realistic, Mr. Griffith has had constructed, walls about 90 feet high and monster gates. The cost is placed at $75,000. This scene will occupy 20 feet of film, meaning that it will be shown for 20 seconds on the screen; or, at a cost of almost $4,000 a second, meaning $4,000 a foot. This would be like building a railway at a cost of $20,000,000 a mile.
Watch D.W. Griffith's Intolerance (1916)

In producing his "The Birth of a Nation," Mr. Griffith really constructed three towns, one of which he destroyed completely to give those realistic scenes of the destruction of Atlanta by fire. Very often railway trestles have been built especially for sensational crises in films, and although many thousands of dollars went into their building, they have been destroyed as though they were the least expensive properties. 
It would perhaps be impossible to count the number of automobiles, motorboats, wagons, buggies, and ships that have been destroyed utterly for the sake of realistic scenes.

Most of the studios set aside so many thousands of dollars a week for thrillers. On several occasions, entire trains have been wrecked merely to give the proper impression on the screen. Money has not counted at all if effects could be secured. Oft times, thousands of dollars have been paid for the rental of beautiful paintings, or necklaces, or costly bric-a-brac, to convey just the right impression on the screen. The camera's relentless eye, assisted by the magnifying power of the projecting machine, shows ,the texture of every fabric and the poorness and richness of every material. 

Everywhere we look we see thousands, and tens of thousands, and millions of dollars heaped unstintingly into the hopper of the mill of entertainment. Compared with the picture industry, all other forms of entertainment dwindle as insignificant. The circuses, carnivals, baseball, football, and all other sports are simply the jitney pastimes in comparison with this monster that entertains and thrills the pleasure-seeking world.

The twenty-five million regular picture patrons of the United States, and the twenty-five million incidental patrons-meaning one-half of our total population, must have something new and something better, regardless of cost. The theatres that ventured into the 10-cent class four years ago, found that their patronage increased instead of diminishing. The new theatres, that charge 15c and 25c, have the same long lines reaching through their foyers out upon the sidewalks that were to be noted in the days of the nickel admission. 

Six years back, the motion picture theatre was such a crude institution, it appealed chiefly to loungers and children. In the larger cities, the school teachers and ministers of the gospel started a movement to suppress what they termed "the evil of the movies." But while the agitation was still in process of formation, the movies outgrew this movement morally and today we find thousands of automobiles parked adjacent to the picture-play theatres of our great cities. The farmer who has become the owner of a motor car, takes his family to town of evenings, and he understands the pictures just as well as the denizen of the "Great White Way." Within the recent past, the Methodist Episcopal Church not only sanctioned pictures as a form of honest entertainment, but adopted the use of pictures in church entertainments. The Christian Science Monitor, that is slow to recognize anything that is untried, has been devoting space to the pictures. 

All classes of all beliefs are picture-mad, because the movies have found the new interpretation that pleases our eyes and pleases our minds. We live the pictures and we supply the words that the silent screen merely suggests. In the passing of an hour we may see three or four dramas, each with a dozen times the number of scenes that the speaking stage would employ in an entire evening. We have seen our old dramatic masterpieces, and the novels we have loved to read, done over in the new dress of the movies. Every time we have read a story, we have pictured its scenes in our minds. But the films relieve us of this duty-they do the picturing for us. And because this is the royal entertainment of the multitude of all classes, of the masses and the elect, we are glad to pay our nickels, our dimes, our quarters, and even our dollars-and we are pleased to know that we have builded a new industrial giant. 

A newspaper published in Utica, N. Y., recently estimated that Utica's population attends the movies three times weekly. Utica is a city of about 80,000. This estimate means that the admissions to picture theatres each week in that city amount to about a quarter-of-a-million.

Chicago has about seven hundred picture-play houses. Their seating capacity ranges from 300 to 2,000; the average is likely 700. That means a total seating capacity of approximately 500,000. Most of them charge 10c or 15c-some more. An average of 8e is fair. These theatres are filled about twice nightly-about twice three matinee days of the week, or a total of twenty times. Each time they are filled, they bring in something like $40,000; and for twenty times, $800,000-that much weekly-or $41,600,000 yearly. This is what one city does in the picture business. Consider the estimates for the entire country. What else has ever even remotely compared with the movies?  

The American Picture-Play the Standard 

All over the world, the American picture-play is the standard. In the beginning we were running neck-and-neck with France and Italy. But the mighty war came on and converted the European studios into Red Cross hospitals and sent the actors and actresses and camera operators to the front as warriors or nurses. And, in the meantime, the picture industry in the U. S. A. has gone forward beyond the measure of all prophecies. It is entertaining the world. It speaks the language of action, which is the fundamental language of all mankind. 

The actors and actresses we have learned to love on the screen are loved as dearly and sincerely in every portion of the world. Thus, our own millions and billions are supplemented by other millions and billions-and the world is crying for more and more, and for better and better. 

The refinement of this new art has been so remarkably rapid, even our most ardent critics have been silenced. The slushy melodrama has gradually receded before the forward march of the finished dramatic screen plays. The art of photoplay construction has been developed to the point of genius, until every crisis, every period of relief of suspense, every climax, every dramatic element has been carefully measured both in the conception and the working out of these silent plays. 

New industries have sprung up on every hand to furnish the supplementary needs of the moving pictures. Architects have found a new demand for their talents in designing studios and theatres. Manufacturers of seats have been working to capacity. Several firms are making screens, that have taken the place of the old plain white drop-curtain. Electrical concerns have made exit lights.

Ventilator manufacturers have solved the problem of supplying ample fresh, pure air. Ticket printers have turned out the pasteboard coupons by the billion. Lithographers have been rushed with the new demand for gaudy posters and the big bill-board stands. Newspapers have opened new departments and have found new sources of advertising. Costumers, modistes and milliners have not only found a new source of profit, but a widespread means of exploiting their art. And beyond this are the many other industries that have turned part, or all, of their attention to the demands of the world of the films. 

A new crop of photographers has sprung into existence, and electricians, carpenters, scenic artists, and other craftsmen have discovered new angles to their trades. House furnishing companies have supplied trainloads of props for the studios. Trappers and trainers of wild animals have been furnishing the tremendous zoos that have become part of the production of the silent drama. The city of Los Angeles has increased in population and wealth, just as Detroit prospered through its motor industry. It is stated that already a million dollars a month is being spent by the picture people in Los Angeles alone. Throughout the length and breadth of the land, there are approximately one hundred studios, many of which employ from two to twenty companies.

And the millions and the billions are still poured into the hopper of the mill of amusement, until one becomes dizzy in the mere act of attempting to estimate and compute. Today, the inquisitive individual who was wont to ask if the pictures would endure, has become conspicuously absent. But all agree that the movies are still in the infant class-that no matter what they have done, they have scarcely found themselves. Publishers, who were delighted in past years with their "six best sellers," never published any book that in any measure brought in the number of dollars that a single movie feature will produce.  

The Highest Paid Profession 

The new branch of art brought into being by the pictures has been productive of the highest salaries paid to any artists, considering the period of employment and the matter of necessary personal expense. 

A syndicate of newspapers, running articles under the name of Mary Pickford, carried full-page advertisements stating that Miss Pickford is the highest paid artist in the world, not even excepting Caruso.
The salaries are lavish and the expenses are small. Many of the well known actors and actresses of the speaking stage have gone in "to do a picture" and have received from $15,000 to $30,000 in compensation. The number of actors and actresses receiving hundreds of dollars: weekly in the picture studios is increasing. Even the modest extra receives $5.00 a day, and the person who plays "bits" usually receives twice that amount. The salaries ranging from $150 to $300 a week are almost too numerous to count.

Unlike the old troupers, who were ever on the go - the movie folk have built beautiful homes, and many of them own expensive estates comparable with the baronial and ducal estates of the old world. They have purchased the highest priced motor cars, and many possess beautiful yachts. They have plunged and dived in thousands and millions. Their measure of fame has been greater than was ever possible when they were obliged to appear personally on the "boards." How many persons throughout the world know Miss Pickford, or Charley Chaplin, or the others in the top places? Each one of these artists is known personally through the intimacy of the screen to tens of millions of individuals. In the passing of one year they appear before more individuals than Joseph Jefferson greeted 'in his long career of a lifetime.

And yet these artists have been but part of this tremendous organization. They have supplied their share. But more than a quarter-of-a-million persons, regularly employed, have been obliged to take care of the various angles demanded by business practice. And yet, even the children of the present day look back to the beginning of the picture-play as a dramatic entity. All likes have been met-all temperaments have been appealed to. Everybody loves the movies. And when everybody is in love with any industry, what must be the answer financially?

Not the Classes – the Masses 

Nothing else on earth has ever appealed to such a vast variety of persons as the films. Rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief-and the balance of the human family-are "fans”. They pay their nickels, dimes and quarters willingly-anxiously.

Down in De Lesseps Park, Panama, some enterprising advertising men erected, an out-door screen. It would be viewed from either side, even if the wording of the titles,' on one side was backwards! Thousands of Panamanians-and scores of visitors-would stand for hours watching the films al fresco. 

At the same time, the city of Panama had about four picture theatres, seating about four to six hundred each, filled to overflowing afternoon and evening. They charged 50c silver-or 25c American money.

Go into the country, along Broadway, in the South - out in the mining camps of the West-in the north woods-in the East; go anywhere-and there you will find the multitude enjoying the films. Try the movies on any nationality, and there also is the same popularity. On no basis, have mortals ever come together so. much and so persistently as they have patronizing the films.

And this means money-mountains of money-money almost beyond counting-cash-in-advance, money paid at the moment. It means profit-such profit as infant industries' never dreamed of making. And this is but the beginning.

Do not ask if the films will endure. They will last for always. They will be improved, changed, added to in various ways, but they have found the universal language-the form of, expression that everybody understands; they have reached nearer to the heart than all the printed words or paintings the world has ever known. The films have worked wonders, but greater wonders lie beyond them-for the next generation-and the next-and the next-ad infinitum. 

The world's most popular amusement presents a future that fairly staggers us with the countless billions it will involve. It will soon pass the billion-a-year mark, and the time will come when even the billion will fade in insignificance. 

The real giant of the financial and the industrial world has sprung up in our midst, as though invisible seeds of enjoyment and endorsement had been sown all over the world. Compared with the magic tales of old, the movies have surpassed all romance and have ridden beyond all imagination.
____________________________




© early cinema digest 

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Charlie Chaplin Interview from February 1915

The following interview with Charlie Chaplin ran in the February 1915 edition of Photoplay magazine. The article is fairly short and is a somewhat superficial piece, but is historically noteworthy for a few reasons. It illustrates the somewhat informal and improvisational filmmaking methods common at the time, and captures Chaplin's thoughts on fame on the eve of superstardom. The article was also written just before the cinematic introduction of the Little Tramp character with which he would be most identified for the remainder of his long career.

Juts one month before the article was published, Chaplin signed a contract with Essanay Studios for a then-record salary of $1250 a week and a $10,000 signing bonus. Although his star had begun to rise over the past year through his appearance in several of Mack Sennet’s comedies, the 14 Essanay films he would make during his one year at the studio, would make him a cultural phenomenon.

What did you think of the article? Post a comment and let me know.
_________________
THE COMEDIAN WHO, ALMOST UNKNOWN A FEW MONTHS AGO, IS NOW SAID TO BE THE HIGHEST SALARIED FUNNY MAN IN THE FILM WORLD
By E. V. Whitcomb

"SAY, Jennie, do I have to sit through this whole show - just to see Charlie?"

With the name of the lady changed to fit the one addressed in each case, this question or ones to the same effect have been asked thousands of times during the past few months.

Going to see Charlie Chaplin has become a habit all over the country: With his doleful countenance, his heavy feet, his characteristic French kick, his diminutive moustache, and his ridiculous actions, he has earned a place all of his own in the realm of  motion pictures.

And it is only a few months ago that he walked unannounced into the office of Mack Sennet, director of the Keystone company, and asked for a tryout as a comedian.

But the funniest thing about this extremely funny man is his violet-like reluctance to talk about Charlie Chaplin. "There's nothing worth while talking about” he says. "I am no one-just a plain fellow," he told me. "There is absolutely nothing interesting about me. I have no fads, no automobiles-I am just myself. But, if you insist, I will be very glad to talk to you."

A lad about twenty-five years of age, a very lovable lad, with a delicate  sensitive face and with his hair painstakingly wetted and smoothed down,  came into the reception room of the club where he lives, all apology for having kept me waiting. And he 'was as appealing as a little boy who runs up to you and says" "I am sorry; please forgive me."

We talked for nearly two hours and I have tried to put down here exactly what he said in the way he said it.

"I have always worked hard ever since my father died, when I was seven years old, My mother was a wonderful woman, highly cultivated, yet life was very hard on her, and we were so poor, she used to sew little blouses by hand, trying to earn enough to keep us. That was in England - she died there. Poverty is a cruel thing, and I sometimes think that if I had not worked so very hard as a child, I would be much stronger now than I am, because, you see, I am not at all strong physically.

"I have never had a day's schooling in my life; my mother taught us what she could, but after she died, I was an apprentice to a company of traveling acrobats, juggIers, and showpeople. That was in England too. And oh, what hard work it was. I have never had a home worth the name. No associations that might have helped me when I was  young. Looking back upon it is no joke, and that is why it seems so out of place to me when I am made much of now.

"I came to New York with mv brother Sidney, while I was still a boy, he is four years older than I am, and is the only relative I have in the world, You have no idea how terriblv lonely we were when we arrived in this country. Sid was out hunting for work and I sat looking out of the window of the shabby little boarding house bedroom. The Times Tower loomed into the sky and I sat there with my head on the window sill and cried, I felt so lonely and forlorn. That was the loneliest I have ever been. The world has never seemed so big nor so lonely since then. "My brother Sid and I went on the road together doing one-night stands with a traveling company called, ‘The National Amusement Company.' I remember one night, Harry Lauder came directly after us on the program. He refused to wait for us to pull off our stunt but insisted on going on first. I hated him for that-it was so cold to stand in the wings, lightly clad as we were, and wait. I watched him do his stunt and even while I hated him fiercely, I couldn't help applauding him as a great artist and laugh maker. It was after this that I went with the Keystone Company.

“Last month I went to San Francisco to appear in person at a theatre. The people applauded me very much. And the more they applauded the more serious I became, and the funnier they thought me-so I gave it up.. You see, I wasn't meaning to be funny then. I am not a bit funny, really. Of course,' I have a sense of humor, but not as much as mv brother has and he is much more of a business man. Sid is much more gifted than I am in every way, I think-and he is married. He hasn't had any professional pictures taken since he came to Keystone, but I know that my brother Sid is going to make a sensation.

 "When I am not working, I just sit around and dream mostly. I get a lot of ideas that way. And sometimes, when I haven't any special idea in mind, the camera man and a few of us with our makeup on, go out to a location. For instance, we go out to the races, take a few scenes (whatever happens to suggest itself), then other things suggest themselves, until the story is built, All the time this is going forward things pop into my head which help to make people laugh."

Mr. Chaplin’s account of producing a comedy sounds very simple and easy but is a little misleading. It is a well-known fact that the members of his company doing slapstick have to be able to stand more "punishment" than the members' of any other company, when he himself is directing.

Already the Essanay players are shaking in their shoes, for Mr. Chaplin has just been signed up with Essanay as the highest priced comedian in the world. He is to direct a comedy company at their Chicago studios.

_________________

Watch Chaplin`s first Essanay film, His New Job (1915)

Watch The Tramp (1915)



© early cinema digest